Summary
A nasal spray containing hypochlorous acid may be a convenient alternative to traditional saline irrigation for patients recovering from sinus surgery, as it showed similar benefits in reducing symptoms and improving health outcomes.
Key points
- HOCl nasal spray is effective as an alternative to normal saline nasal irrigation after sinus surgery.
- Both treatments showed benefits, but HOCl spray is more convenient for patients.
- Further research is needed to explore long-term effects of HOCl on nasal health.
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy of hypochlorous acid (opens in a new tab) (HOCl) nasal spray (opens in a new tab) as an adjuvant therapy after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (opens in a new tab) (FESS).
Material and methods
Patients (opens in a new tab) with chronic rhinosinusitis (opens in a new tab) who had received FESS for treatment (opens in a new tab) were recruited and assigned to one of two groups at random at one month post-surgery. In the HOCl group, patients received 0.02% HOCl nasal spray (opens in a new tab) three times a day for two months. In the control group, normal saline (NS) nasal irrigation (opens in a new tab) was given. Before FESS and before and after nasal spray or irrigation, patients completed the Taiwanese version of the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (TWSNOT-22). In addition, patients received endoscopic examination, acoustic rhinometry (opens in a new tab), smell test, saccharine (opens in a new tab) transit test, and bacterial cultures (opens in a new tab) obtained from their middle meatus.
Results
Seventy-eight patients completed the study. Among them, 41 received HOCl nasal spray, and 37 received NS irrigation. Endoscopic score significantly decreased after 2-month HOCl nasal spray (p = 0.036). TWSNOT-22 score also decreased, although insignificantly (p = 0.285). In contrast, TWSNOT-22 score significantly decreased after NS nasal irrigation (opens in a new tab) (p = 0.017), but endoscopic score did not significantly decrease (p = 0.142).
Conclusions
Our results showed that HOCl nasal spray had a similar effect to that of NS nasal irrigation in post-FESS care. It can be an alternative of NS nasal irrigation for its convenient application.
Introduction
Topical therapy is a popular treatment modality for various sinonasal diseases including upper respiratory tract infection, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, and postoperative or post-radiation care [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Topical therapy may have several effects including mechanical removal of mucus and crusts, increase in mucus clearance, enhanced ciliary beat activity, disruption and removal of antigens, and biofilm and inflammatory mediators [6]. It can also transport medication into the sinus [7]. However, there is little consensus on the methods of topical therapy, including the rinsing volume, pressure, frequency, devices, and head position [6]. Among different methods, nasal saline irrigation is currently recommended for postoperative treatment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps [8].
Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) is a weak acid which is produced when chlorine dissolves in water, and has been demonstrated to have bactericidal effects [9]. HOCl solution has been used as a nasal irrigant to treat chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) [10], [11]. Recently, HOCl solution has become commercially available as a nasal spray in Taiwan. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of HOCl nasal spray as an adjuvant therapy after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).
Section snippets
Study design and population
The flow chart and design of the experiment are shown in Fig. 1. CRS Patients who failed medical treatment and subsequently underwent FESS were collected between February 2017 and January 2020. The diagnosis of CRS was made according to the EPOS criteria based on patient history, nasal endoscopy, and CT of the sinuses [6]. We excluded patients who had taken antibiotics within a week before FESS, and those with a history of immunodeficiency or sinus surgery. Patients with a pathological
Patients
A total of 78 patients were included in the final analysis, with 41 in the HOCl group and 37 in the saline group (Fig. 1). Among the 78 patients, 24 were comorbid with allergic rhinitis and 4 had allergic rhinitis and asthma. Fifty-six were grouped having type-2 CRS and the others were non-type 2 endotype. Forty-five had CRSsNPs and 33 had CRSwNPs. In the HOCl group, the mean age was 47.9 years (range: 21 to 80), with 25 males and 16 females. In the saline group, the mean age was 43.8 years
Discussion
A low concentration of HOCl solution has been reported to have strong anti-bacterial, antiviral, and anti-fungal effects [9]. Cho et al. treated 26 pediatric CRS patients without a history of nasal surgery using low-concentration hypochlorous nasal irrigation or saline nasal irrigation for 4 weeks [10]. Patients received nasal irrigation with 30 mL of HOCl or normal saline for 10 s twice a day while sitting or standing. They found that nasal irrigation with a low concentration of HOCl solution
Conclusions
The HOCl nasal spray used in this study is commercially available and convenient to use. Patients do not need to make HOCL solution themselves using a device. It had a similar effect on post-FESS care compared with saline nasal irrigation. It might be an alternative to nasal saline irrigation for post-FESS care in the era of COVID-19. Further investigation should be conducted to determine the long-term effects of low-concentration HOCl solution on sinonasal mucosa.
Ethical statement
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Taichung Veterans General Hospital. Written consent was obtained from each patient.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Biostatistics Task Force, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, for assistance with the statistical analysis.
Funding
This study was supported by a grant (TCVGH-1067006C) from Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, R.O.C.
References (21)
- V.J. Lund* et al.*(1997)
Staging for rhinosinusitis (opens in a new tab)
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
- F. Yoo* et al.*(2018)
Evaluation of patient nasal saline irrigation practices following endoscopic sinus surgery
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol
- W.J. Rietsema(2016)
Nasal irrigation
CMAJ
- K.E. Hermelingmeier* et al.*(2012)
Nasal irrigation as an adjunctive treatment in allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Am J Rhinol Allergy
- K.L. Liang* et al.*(2008)
Impact of pulsatile nasal irrigation on the prognosis of functional endoscopic sinus surgery
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
- K.L. Liang* et al.*(2008)
Nasal irrigation reduces postirradiation rhinosinusitis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Am J Rhinol
- W.J. Fokkens* et al.*(2020)
European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020
Rhinology
- R.J. Harvey* et al.*(2010)
Current concepts in topical therapy for chronic sinonasal disease
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
- W.J. Fokkens* et al.*(2012)
European position paper on Rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012
Rhinol Suppl
- H.J. Kim* et al.*(2008)
Effects of a low concentration hypochlorous acid nasal irrigation solution on bacteria, fungi, and virus
Laryngoscope
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (2)
- Does Hypochlorous Acid Cause Ototoxicity? An Experimental Study (opens in a new tab)2022, Otology and Neurotology
- Efficacy of the Sentinox Spray in Reducing Viral Load in Mild COVID-19 and Its Virucidal Activity against Other Respiratory Viruses: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial and an In Vitro Study (opens in a new tab)2022, Viruses