Conspire.to
disinfect
Translate this page

Far UV-C Light

Far UV-C is a kind of ultraviolet light that can inactivate airborne viruses and bacteria while people are still in the room.

Cost
About US$195 a lamp
How many
One per 8 to 10 m³
Mounting
2.5 m or higher
Works with
Open windows and filters

Disinfecting light you can stand under

Ultraviolet light has disinfected air and water for a century, so why can’t you stand under it? Because ordinary germicidal lamps shine at 254 nm, which burns skin and eyes. They only run in empty rooms, or in fixtures aimed over people’s heads.

Far UV-C sits at the short end of the band, 200 to 230 nm. Krypton-chloride (KrCl) lamps make it at 222 nm, and a filter blocks their longer, harsher wavelengths. Light that short travels only a few micrometers into tissue, so it stops in the dead outer layer of your skin and in your eyes’ tear film (opens in a new tab). A virus floating in the air has no such shield.

It works on the air you share

How do you clean air that everyone is breathing at once? Colds, flu and COVID travel on it, and far UV-C works on it all day, with no fan to run and no filter to change.

That’s the job ventilating and filtering do too: less virus in the room’s air. It helps prevent infection; it won’t treat one.

Why isn’t it everywhere?

Up high, aimed down

  • Buy filtered 222 nm lamps. Ask the maker for a measured light pattern (radiometry) and a chamber test by an independent lab. Wattage alone won’t tell you what comes out.
  • Count the cubic meters. The Nukit Lantern’s seller suggests one lamp per 10 m³ alongside a filter, or one per 8 m³ without. A 3.7 by 3.7 m bedroom with a 2.6 m ceiling holds about 35 m³: four lamps.
  • Mount them high. The Lantern’s instructions say at least 2.5 m up, in the upper corners, aimed at the bottom of the opposite wall. Other lamps have their own rules; follow them.
  • Run them while people are there. That’s when virus is in the air. An occupancy sensor switches lamps on and off with the room and saves lamp life.

Before you switch it on

Caution

  • Filtered 222 nm only. Unfiltered lamps and ordinary 254 nm germicidal lamps burn eyes and skin. Never look into any UV lamp at close range.
  • Know which limit applies. Since 2022, ACGIH’s 8-hour limits at 222 nm are 161 mJ/cm² for eyes and 479 mJ/cm² for skin (summary (opens in a new tab)). The older 23 mJ/cm² for both, which ICNIRP set in 2004, is still the reference many regulators use. We ran the Nukit Lantern’s measured light pattern through the numbers, counting no reflections and an all-day stay: four lamps at 2.5 m reach about half the ACGIH eye limit at a tall adult’s eye height, and more than three times the older 23. Mounted 30 cm lower, they pass the ACGIH eye limit. That is our arithmetic on the maker’s data, not a safety assessment. Ask any maker for one.
  • Mind the ozone. 222 nm light makes ozone (opens in a new tab), which reacts with indoor air to form fine particles (opens in a new tab). Keep a window open or a filter running alongside.

Long-term safety in people is still under study. Hairless mice under 222 nm light for 66 weeks (opens in a new tab) showed no skin cancer or other skin changes, and office workers under filtered lamps had no eye irritation (opens in a new tab).

Where to get lamps

Nukit Lantern

Which lamp? We like the Nukit Lantern, because its maker publishes its lab reports. It’s a 6 W filtered 222 nm lamp with a presence sensor, made by Shenzhen Nukit Technology and sold by The Cyber Night-Market (opens in a new tab) for US$194.95, less in fives and tens. It was sold out in October 2026 and isn’t sold to Canada.

The maker’s tests, run by the Guangzhou Institute of Microbiology, show what it does in a sealed 30 m³ chamber with a fan mixing the air. Over one hour, against a common-cold coronavirus, 2 lamps removed 75% of airborne virus beyond what died on its own, 3 removed 84%, 4 removed 89% and 5 removed 95%. Its measured light pattern (opens in a new tab) is public. A stirred chamber isn’t a home, and none of this counts infections.

Two things didn’t add up: the store’s “UL 1598” link opens a safety report for a different Nukit lamp, the Torch, and we found no report behind its “UL 2998 zero-ozone” badge.

Ushio Care222

Ushio makes the lamps. Its Care222 filtered module (opens in a new tab) sits inside many commercial fixtures, such as Acuity’s (opens in a new tab), sold to businesses and hospitals rather than homes. For hospital systems, see Hospital.

The research

8 papers chosen for this practice, each with its source and summary. After them, every study in the database that mentions far UV-C light.

  • Scientific Reports · 2024

    222 nm far-UVC light markedly reduces the level of infectious airborne virus in an occupied room (opens in a new tab)

    A study found that 222 nm far-UVC light can significantly reduce airborne viruses in occupied spaces, offering a promising method for controlling airborne infections without harming people.

    Key points
    • 222 nm far-UVC light can significantly reduce airborne viruses in occupied spaces.
    • In a study, it reduced infectious murine norovirus by 99.8% in a mouse-cage cleaning room.
    • This technology poses minimal risk to human health while effectively inactivating pathogens.
    • Far-UVC light may be a promising solution for controlling airborne diseases in public areas.
  • Biomed Res Int · 2023

    Antimicrobial Activity of Filtered Far-UVC Light (222 nm) against Different Pathogens (opens in a new tab)

    This study shows that far-UVC light at 222 nm effectively kills various harmful germs, making it a promising option for disinfecting places like hospitals without harming human skin or eyes.

    Key points
    • 222 nm far-UVC light effectively disinfects various pathogens, including bacteria and fungi.
    • Significant reduction in microbial colonies observed after 30 minutes of exposure at 50 cm distance.
    • Far-UVC light is safer for human skin and eyes compared to traditional UV light.
    • Potential applications in healthcare settings to combat hard-to-inactivate pathogens.
    • Study provides a reliable method for measuring disinfection efficacy.
  • AJIC · 2024

    Effectiveness of 222-nm ultraviolet light on disinfecting SARS-CoV-2 surface contamination (opens in a new tab)

    A study found that 222-nm ultraviolet light can effectively reduce the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on surfaces, making it a potentially useful tool for disinfecting areas to help prevent COVID-19 transmission.

    Key points
    • 222-nm UVC light effectively disinfects surfaces contaminated with SARS-CoV-2.
    • Chronic exposure to 222-nm UVC light does not cause DNA damage or skin lesions in mice.
    • Long-term use of 222-nm UVC light sterilizing lamps is safe for mice.
    • 222-nm UVC light inactivates a wide range of microbial pathogens.
    • Far-UVC light can help control airborne transmission of diseases.
  • Elsevier Inc. · 2024

    Efficacy of a filtered far-UVC handheld disinfection device in reducing the microbial bioburden of hospital surfaces (opens in a new tab)

    A handheld disinfection device using far UV-C light effectively reduces harmful bacteria on hospital surfaces, making it a useful alternative when traditional cleaning methods are not feasible.

    Key points
    • The FFUV handheld device significantly reduces microbial pathogens on hospital surfaces.
    • It achieved an estimated 81.4% reduction in colony counts compared to manual disinfection.
    • The device is particularly useful when manual disinfection is not feasible.
    • FFUV can supplement traditional cleaners and disinfectants.
  • tandfonline.com · 2022

    Far UV-C radiation: An emerging tool for pandemic control (opens in a new tab)

    Far UV-C radiation is an effective and safe method for inactivating airborne pathogens, including viruses like COVID-19, without harming human skin or eyes.

  • Scientific Reports · 2022

    Far-UVC (222 nm) efficiently inactivates an airborne pathogen in a room-sized chamber (opens in a new tab)

    Far-UVC light (222 nm) has been shown to effectively inactivate airborne pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus in a room-sized environment, making it a promising technology for reducing airborne disease transmission without harmful effects on human health.

    Key points
    • Far-UVC light (222 nm) effectively inactivates airborne pathogens in room-sized environments.
    • The study demonstrates the potential of Far-UVC as a disinfection method in public spaces.
    • The research highlights the importance of using safe UV light to reduce the spread of airborne viruses.
    • Far-UVC technology could be a valuable tool in controlling infections, especially in healthcare settings.
Show all 8 papersShow fewer papers
  • Scientific Reports · 2020

    Predicting airborne coronavirus inactivation by far-UVC in populated rooms using a high-fidelity coupled radiation-CFD model (opens in a new tab)

    Using far-UVC lighting in populated rooms can significantly reduce the transmission of airborne coronavirus, providing a safe and effective method of disinfection without harming people.

    Key points
    • Far-UVC light (222 nm) effectively inactivates airborne coronaviruses.
    • Safe for use in populated rooms without harming human skin.
    • Can be a valuable tool for reducing the spread of airborne diseases.
    • Research supports the development of UV-based disinfection systems.
  • IOVS · 2024

    Safety and efficacy of 222-nm far-UVC disinfection for ophthalmic surgery (opens in a new tab)

    The research demonstrates that 222-nm far-UVC light is safe for eye tissue and effectively kills bacteria on the cornea, offering a promising new method for disinfection in ophthalmic surgery.

    Key points
    • 222-nm far-UVC exposure is safe for corneal epithelial cells.
    • 9 mJ/cm2 of 222-nm far-UVC effectively eliminates bacteria on the corneal surface.
    • Silk fibroin (SF) corneal bandages provide a suture-less alternative to amniotic membrane for corneal abrasions.
    • SF membranes show good bonding strength and stability in both lab and live rabbit models.
    • No signs of edema or significant neovascularization observed in treated corneas.
All 20 matched studies

The 20 studies are matched to this practice by keyword, so a few may only mention it.